WebThe Supreme Court answered in the negative a question certified from the federal district court and held that Ind. Code 34-20-3-1 (b) is a statute of repose that cannot be extended by a manufacturer's post-delivery repair, refurbishment, or reconstruction of a disputed product. Web1 day ago · COURT: N.D. Ind. TRACK DOCKET: No. 1:23-cv-00164. Raytheon Technologies Corp. and other companies should be held responsible for costs to help clean up soil and groundwater contamination at a property in Indiana, according to a lawsuit filed Thursday in federal court. Lea-Max Corp. alleged that Raytheon, along with Pullman Co. and Gould ...
Indiana Product Liability Act: What You Should Know
WebJan 23, 2024 · The Indiana Product Liability Act (IPLA) governs Indiana product liability cases. This article covers the basics of product liability, what the IPLA has to say about … WebThe Appellate Court noted that there are three things that a plaintiff must show under the Indiana Products Liability Act – 1) the product is defective and unreasonably dangerous; … branch premise access log
Product Liability - The Indiana Lawyer
WebIndiana Code For Year 2016. We have some improvements in the works that we're excited for you to experience. WebIndiana Supreme Court Case No. 19S-CQ-590 March 2, 2024 Page 2 of 11 Slaughter, Justice. The Indiana Products Liability Act contains what we have held is a ten-year … WebNov 13, 2024 · Indiana’s state and federal courts have long held that the incurred risk and product alteration defenses under Indiana’s Product Liability Act (“IPLA”) constitute “complete defenses.” This means that, if a defendant can prove one of these defenses, the plaintiff is barred from recovering from the defendant for any injuries suffered from the … branch projection portal 2015 hbctxdom.com